Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39815671›Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2025

Precision Psychobiotics for Gut-Brain Axis Health: Advancing the Discovery Pipelines to Deliver Mechanistic Pathways and Proven Health Efficacy.

Rebecca F Slykerman, Naomi Davies, Klara Vlckova, Kenneth J O'Riordan, Shalome A Bassett, James Dekker, Harriët Schellekens, Niall P Hyland, Gerard Clarke, Elaine Patterson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Gut-brain axis in health and brain disease.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Microbiome: A Key Regulator of Body-Brain Interactions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rebecca F SlykermanDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Naomi DaviesDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Klara VlckovaFonterra Microbiome Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Kenneth J O'RiordanAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Shalome A BassettFonterra Research and Development Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
James DekkerFonterra Research and Development Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Harriët SchellekensAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Niall P HylandAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Gerard ClarkeAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9771-3979
Elaine PattersonFonterra Microbiome Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

Fonterra Co-Operative GroupScience Foundation Ireland SFI/12/RC/2273_P2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancing microbiome-gut-brain axis science requires systematic, rational and translational approaches to bridge the critical knowledge gaps currently preventing full exploitation of the gut microbiome as a tractable therapeutic target for gastrointestinal, mental and brain health. Current research is still marked by many open questions that undermine widespread application to humans. For example, the lack of mechanistic understanding of probiotic effects means it remains unclear why even apparently closely related strains exhibit different effects in vivo. For the therapeutic application of live microbial psychobiotics, consensus on their application as adjunct treatments to conventional neuromodulators, use in unmedicated populations or in at-risk cohorts with sub-clinical symptomatology is warranted. This missing information on both sides of the therapeutic equation when treating central nervous system (CNS) conditions makes psychobiotic research challenging, especially when compared to other pharmaceutical or functional food approaches. Expediting the transition from positive preclinical data to proven benefits in humans includes interpreting the promises and pitfalls of animal behavioural assays, as well as navigating mechanism-informed decision making to select the right microbe(s) for the job. In this review, we consider how these decisions can be supported in light of information accrued from a range of clinical studies across healthy, at-risk and pathological study populations, where specific strains have been evaluated in the context of gastrointestinal physiology, brain function and behaviour. Examples of successful, partial and unsuccessful translation from bench to bedside are considered. We also discuss the developments in in silico analyses that have enhanced our understanding of the gut microbiome and that have moved research towards pinpointing the host-microbe interactions most important for optimal gut-brain axis function. Combining this information with knowledge from functional assays across in vitro and ex vivo domains and incorporating model organisms can prime the discovery pipelines with the most promising and rationally selected psychobiotic candidates.

Indexed as

BrainBrain-Gut AxisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAnimalsGastrointestinal TractHumansbehaviourGPCRgut‐brain axismicrobiomeprobioticpsychobioticshort chain fatty acidstryptophan

Identifiers

PMID39815671
PMCPMC11735468

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.