ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Mismatch repair deficiency confers worse survival in stage IV colon cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What is the significance of mismatch repair deficiency in stage IV colon cancer?Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metastatic colon cancer (MCC) is a debilitating condition with a poor prognosis. Currently, there is limited data that investigates MCC in relation to mismatch repair (MMR) status. The aims of this study are to compare sociodemographic and clinicopathologic features and mortality between patients with MMR-proficient (MMR-P) and MMR-deficient (MMR-D) MCC. Methods: We performed an 8-year retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify patients age ≥18 years with MCC and reported MMR status. Data collection included sociodemographic characteristics, primary tumor sites and histopathologic features, and treatment modalities. Outcomes included 90-day, 180-day, 1-year, and 2-year overall mortality. Bivariate logistic regression and multivariate Cox regression identified differences between MMR-P and MMR-D and identified predictors of mortality, respectively. Results: A total of 10,922 MCC cases were identified; 8,796 (80.53%) were MMR-P and 2,126 (19.47%) were MMR-D. MMR-D was independently associated with older age at diagnosis, female sex, mucinous adenocarcinoma, medullary carcinoma, and lymph-vascular invasion. MMR-P was independently associated with perineural invasion and left-sided colonic primary tumor predominance. When adjusted for demographics, histology, and treatment modalities, MMR-D was associated with mortality at 180 days, 1 year, and 2 years. Conclusions: Our study identified several key sociodemographic and clinicopathologic features of MMR-D MCC. MMR-D appears to confer increased overall mortality at 180 days, 1 year, and 2 years after diagnosis in MCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.