Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816202›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of radiology open2025

Peroneus brevis split tear - A challenging diagnosis: A pictorial review of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging - Part 2: Imaging with magnetic resonance and ultrasound.

Katarzyna Bokwa-Dąbrowska, Dan Mocanu, Isaac Romanus, Rafał Zych, Michael Huuskonen, Pawel Szaro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Split Peroneus Brevis: An Overlooked Cause of Ankle Dysfunction.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katarzyna Bokwa-DąbrowskaDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Dan MocanuDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Isaac RomanusDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Rafał ZychDepartment of Clinical and Descriptive Anatomy, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Michael HuuskonenDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Pawel SzaroDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peroneal tendon pathology is common among physically active individuals, with tenosynovitis, tendon subluxation, split tears and rupture. However, diagnosing these conditions, particularly peroneus brevis split tears, is clinically and radiologically challenging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) can sometimes miss split tears. A significant portion of peroneus split tears develops on a background of tendinopathy. The presence of tenosynovitis, changes in tendon shape, and multiple subtendons can indicate a complete multifragmenting split tear. A defect on the surface of the tendon may indicate a partial-thickness split tear, commonly referred to as the "cleft sign." Peroneus subluxation is particularly likely when the superior peroneal retinaculum is torn. Given the subtlety of clinical symptoms, radiological evaluation is essential. Dynamic US assessment is especially valuable for detecting instability and split tears. This pictorial review presents the imaging spectrum of the most common pathologies of the peroneus brevis tendon on US and MRI.

Indexed as

Magnetic resonance imagingRuptureTearTendonUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39816202
PMCPMC11733185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.