Evidence mapPaperPMID 39816205Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2025

Latest Advancements in Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Electronic Muscle Stimulation (EMS): Revisiting an Established Therapy with New Possibilities.

Prachi Patel, Maja Green, Jennifer Tram, Eugene Wang, Melissa Murphy, Alaa A Abd-Elsayed, Krishnan Chakravarthy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07375823 (Effects of Electrical Muscle Stimulation Applied Concurrently With Active Movement and Exercise Therapy in Cervical Radiculopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07375823 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Electrical Muscle Stimulation Applied Concurrently With Active Movement and Exercise Therapy in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean University of LefkeRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsCervical Radiculopathy, Cervical Radicular Pain, Neck Pain, NumbnessArmsExercise Therapy, Superimposition of electrical muscle stimulation on active movement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prachi PatelHouston Methodist Willowbrook Hospital, Neuroscience Centre, Houston, Tx, USA.
Maja GreenNXTSTIM INC. Department of Pain Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jennifer TramUCLA David Geffen School of Medicine/VA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Eugene WangTimothy Growth, Pain Management and Chiropractic Care, Smithtown, NY, USA.
Melissa MurphyNorth Texas Orthopedics and Spine Center, Grapevine, TX, 76051, USA.
Alaa A Abd-ElsayedUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Health Sciences Learning Center, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Krishnan ChakravarthyNXTSTIM INC. Department of Pain Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Electronic Muscle Stimulation (EMS) are non-invasive therapies widely used for pain relief and neuromuscular adaptation. However, the clinical research supporting the efficacy of TENS in chronic pain management is limited by significant methodological flaws, including small sample sizes and inconsistent reporting of stimulation parameters. TENS modulates pain perception through various techniques, targeting specific nerve fibers and pain pathways. High-frequency TENS is effective for segmental pain control, while low-frequency TENS, reliant on endogenous opioid pathways, may be less effective in opioid-tolerant patients. Additionally, TENS may influence autonomic functions, such as micro-perfusion and sympathetic tone, further broadening its therapeutic potential. EMS, on the other hand, enhances muscle strength and neuromuscular function, particularly in rehabilitation settings, by recruiting additional muscle fibers and improving neuromuscular efficiency. To address the limitations in existing clinical applications, future advancements in TENS and EMS technologies should focus on real-time optimization of stimulation parameters, consistent therapy delivery, and improved accessibility. Integrating automated and personalized adjustments can help streamline treatment, enhance patient compliance, and overcome traditional barriers to the effective implementation of these modalities. Additionally, developing systems that enable remote monitoring and customization of therapy protocols will expand the usability of TENS and EMS in diverse care settings. Future research must focus on rigorous study designs, standardized protocols, and meaningful patient-centered outcomes to fully realize the therapeutic potential of these modalities. Innovations like NXTSTIM EcoAI™ represent a significant advancement in delivering tailored, effective, and patient-friendly pain management and rehabilitation strategies.

Indexed as

central sensitizationchronic painEMSgate control theoryneurotransmittersTENS

Identifiers

PMID39816205
PMCPMC11733168

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.