Review3 Biotech2025
Revisiting the potential of natural antimicrobial peptides against emerging respiratory viral disease: a review.
Review in 3 Biotech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanotechnology in COVID-19 prevention, diagnosis, and treatment: a comprehensive review.Discover nano · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review assesses the antiviral capabilities of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) against SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses, focussing on their therapeutic potential. AMPs, derived from natural sources, exhibit promising antiviral properties by disrupting viral membranes, inhibiting viral entry, and modulating host immune responses. Preclinical studies demonstrate that peptides such as defensins, cathelicidins, and lactoferrin can effectively reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication and inhibit viral spread. In addition, AMPs have shown potential in enhancing the host's antiviral immunity. Despite these promising outcomes, several challenges require assessments before transforming into clinical translation. Several issues related to peptide stability, cytotoxicity, and efficient delivery systems pose significant limitations to their therapeutic application. Recent advancements in peptide engineering, nanotechnology-based delivery systems, and peptide conjugation strategies have improved AMPs stability and bioavailability; however, further optimization is essential. Moreover, whilst AMPs are safe, their effects on host cells and tissues need a thorough investigation to minimise potential adverse reactions. This review concludes that whilst AMPs present a promising route for antiviral therapies, particularly in targeting SARS-CoV-2, extensive clinical trials and additional studies are required to overcome current limitations. Future research should focus on developing more stable, less toxic AMPs formulations with enhanced delivery mechanisms, aiming to integrate AMPs into viable therapeutic options for respiratory viral diseases, including COVID-19 and other emerging infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.