Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816913›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Mapping the 3D genome architecture.

Ghazaleh Tavallaee, Elias Orouji

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ghazaleh TavallaeePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elias OroujiPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatial organization of the genome plays a critical role in regulating gene expression, cellular differentiation, and genome stability. This review provides an in-depth examination of the methodologies, computational tools, and frameworks developed to map the three-dimensional (3D) architecture of the genome, focusing on both ligation-based and ligation-free techniques. We also explore the limitations of these methods, including biases introduced by restriction enzyme digestion and ligation inefficiencies, and compare them to more recent ligation-free approaches such as Genome Architecture Mapping (GAM) and Split-Pool Recognition of Interactions by Tag Extension (SPRITE). These techniques offer unique insights into higher-order chromatin structures by bypassing ligation steps, thus enabling the capture of complex multi-way interactions that are often challenging to resolve with traditional methods. Furthermore, we discuss the integration of chromatin interaction data with other genomic layers through multimodal approaches, including recent advances in single-cell technologies like sci-HiC and scSPRITE, which help unravel the heterogeneity of chromatin architecture in development and disease.

Indexed as

3D genome architectureChromatinChromatin conformation captureEpigenomicsHi-CSingle-cell genomics

Identifiers

PMID39816913
PMCPMC11732852

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.