ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Sub-Saharan Africa's Contribution to Clinical Trials in International Acute Coronary Syndromes and Heart Failure Guidelines.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular innovation without equity risks widening global gaps.MedScience · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular impacts of combination cancer therapies in Africa: challenges and solutions.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Longitudinal clinical trial enrollment trends across 341 US FDA-approved drugs and their guiding role in precision medicine strategies.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Equitable Global Representation in Cardiovascular Guidelines and Clinical Trials: Lacunae Remain.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a growing burden of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and heart failure (HF) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), yet outcomes remain poor compared to high-income countries. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) international guidelines are pivotal to the delivery of evidence-based care; however, their representation of populations from SSA remains unclear. Objectives: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the representation of populations from SSA in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that inform ESC ACS and HF guidelines. Methods: We systematically analyzed pharmacotherapeutic RCTs contributing to the 2021 ESC HF and 2023 ACS guidelines, extracting data from ClinicalTrials.gov. We assessed the proportion of RCTs that included contributions from countries in each World Bank income group, focusing on the involvement of SSA countries and examining temporal trends. Results: Among the RCTs underpinning the ESC HF guidelines (n = 119) and ACS guidelines (n = 343), 75.9% were conducted exclusively in high-income countries. Middle-income countries were included in 22.2% of the trials, but none featured low-income countries. Within SSA, only South Africa was represented, contributing to 14.2% of HF and 8.2% of ACS RCTs. The number of HF RCTs involving populations from SSA has risen, from 2.6% in the 1990s to 50% post-2020 ( Conclusions: There is a marked underrepresentation of SSA countries in ACS and HF pharmacotherapy RCTs. South Africa is the sole contributor from the region, which may affect applicability and generalizability of global guidelines to populations in SSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.