ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2025
Multiple sclerosis and infection: history, EBV, and the search for mechanism.
Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights into the therapeutic strategies for aging and aging-associated diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- CD8+ Regulatory T Cells.Annual review of immunology · 2026Review
- Differential diagnosis between NMOSD and MS: a retrospective study based on clinical and imaging features.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Eph receptor tyrosine kinases are functional entry receptors for murine gammaherpesvirus 68.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- Epstein-Barr Virus miRNAs in Multiple Sclerosis: Unveiling their role in Immune Regulation and Potential for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Innovation.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Integrated transcriptomics of multiple sclerosis peripheral blood mononuclear cells explored potential biomarkers for the disease.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SUMMARYInfection has long been hypothesized as the cause of multiple sclerosis (MS), and recent evidence for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) as the trigger of MS is clear and compelling. This clarity contrasts with yet uncertain viral mechanisms and their relation to MS neuroinflammation and demyelination. As long as this disparity persists, it will invigorate virologists, molecular biologists, immunologists, and clinicians to ascertain how EBV potentiates MS onset, and possibly the disease's chronic activity and progression. Such efforts should take advantage of the diverse body of basic and clinical research conducted over nearly two centuries since the first clinical descriptions of MS plaques. Defining the contribution of EBV to the complex and multifactorial pathology of MS will also require suitable experimental models and techniques. Such efforts will broaden our understanding of virus-driven neuroinflammation and specifically inform the development of EBV-targeted therapies for MS management and, ultimately, prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.