Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39818221›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2025

Quantifying Plasmodium vivax radical cure efficacy: a modelling study integrating clinical trial data and transmission dynamics.

Constanze Ciavarella, Chris Drakeley, Ric N Price, Ivo Mueller, Michael White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrating parallelCommunications health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Constanze CiavarellaInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, G5 Épidémiologie et Analyse des Maladies Infectieuses, Paris, France.
Chris DrakeleyLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ric N PriceGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ivo MuellerWalter and Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Michael WhiteInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, G5 Épidémiologie et Analyse des Maladies Infectieuses, Paris, France. Electronic address: michael.white@pasteur.fr.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-007122Gates Foundation INV-024368Wellcome Trust 200909/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlasmodium vivax forms dormant liver stages (hypnozoites) that can reactivate weeks to months after primary infection. Radical cure requires a combination of antimalarial drugs to kill both the blood-stage and liver-stage parasites. Hypnozoiticidal efficacy of the liver-stage drugs primaquine and tafenoquine cannot be estimated directly because hypnozoites are undetectable. We aimed to estimate hypnozoiticidal efficacy from clinical trial data, and quantify the community-level impact of implementing case management with radical cure.

methodsWe calibrated a novel P vivax Recurrence Model to publicly available data from prospective clinical trials to estimate the hypnozoiticidal efficacy of different supervised primaquine (3·5 mg/kg or 7 mg/kg over 7 or 14 days) and tafenoquine (5 mg/kg or 7·5 mg/kg single dose) regimens in patients with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity. We used an existing P vivax Individual-Based Model to quantify the 5-year impact of case management with unsupervised primaquine or tafenoquine regimens across various transmission settings.

findingsWe estimated median hypnozoiticidal efficacies of 99·1% (95% credible interval 96·0-100) for primaquine 7 mg/kg over 14 days; 96·3% (90·8-99·7) for primaquine 7 mg/kg over 7 days; 72·3% (68·1-76·3) for primaquine 3·5 mg/kg over 7 or 14 days; 62·4% (49·1-76·3) for tafenoquine 5 mg/kg single dose; and 87·5% (62·1-99·3) for tafenoquine 7·5 mg/kg single dose. 5 years of community-level tafenoquine case management was estimated to reduce P vivax transmission by 74-79% where pre-intervention prevalence as measured by PCR was low (<2%) and by 17-20% where prevalence as measured by PCR was high (around 35%). Similar 5-year reductions were estimated with primaquine case management only when adherence to the primaquine regimen was above 50%.

interpretationSubstantial reductions in prevalence as measured by PCR were predicted with primaquine and tafenoquine regimens if these could be implemented with high coverage and adherence. The benefits of preventing P vivax relapses need to be balanced against the risks of inducing severe haemolysis in patients with G6PD deficiency.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Horizon Europe.

Indexed as

AminoquinolinesAntimalarialsMalaria, VivaxPlasmodium vivaxPrimaquineAdolescentAdultClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAminoquinolinesAntimalarialsPrimaquinetafenoquine

Identifiers

PMID39818221
PMCPMC12095116

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.