ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2025
The impact of FDA-cleared molecular solutions for BK polyomavirus quantitation.
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- BKPyV-Co-Architect of the Fate of a Renal Transplant During a One-Year Observation Period.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Unveiling pathogens and contaminants: refining metagenomics for clinical diagnostics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Urinary VP1 Flow Cytometry as a Complementary Approach for BK Polyomavirus Monitoring: A Proof-Of-Concept Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate detection and monitoring of BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is of critical importance in the post-transplant period, guiding treatment decisions that balance the anti-rejection effects of immune suppression with host-protective effects of immune defense. Historically, test methods for BKV have been independently developed by laboratories to address this unmet need. However, these assays can suffer from inconsistencies in analytical variability, which in turn have hindered the establishment of commutable and clinically actionable viral load thresholds for clinical management. As a result, the interpretation of viral load quantitation has not been standardized across transplant centers for the purpose of monitoring patients at highest risk for infection-related complications. In this review, we describe challenges that have historically limited widespread adoption of BKV quantitative testing. We then detail how developments in the field, including optimized amplicon selection, the introduction of an international standard, and the availability of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared methods, have played a role in harmonization of quantitative BKV measurements in the clinical management of transplant recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.