Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39818950›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2025

The impact of FDA-cleared molecular solutions for BK polyomavirus quantitation.

Bijal A Parikh, Neil W Anderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Urinary VP1 Flow Cytometry as a Complementary Approach for BK Polyomavirus Monitoring: A Proof-Of-Concept Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bijal A ParikhDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2490-8294
Neil W AndersonDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2805-2174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection and monitoring of BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is of critical importance in the post-transplant period, guiding treatment decisions that balance the anti-rejection effects of immune suppression with host-protective effects of immune defense. Historically, test methods for BKV have been independently developed by laboratories to address this unmet need. However, these assays can suffer from inconsistencies in analytical variability, which in turn have hindered the establishment of commutable and clinically actionable viral load thresholds for clinical management. As a result, the interpretation of viral load quantitation has not been standardized across transplant centers for the purpose of monitoring patients at highest risk for infection-related complications. In this review, we describe challenges that have historically limited widespread adoption of BKV quantitative testing. We then detail how developments in the field, including optimized amplicon selection, the introduction of an international standard, and the availability of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared methods, have played a role in harmonization of quantitative BKV measurements in the clinical management of transplant recipients.

Indexed as

BK VirusPolyomavirus InfectionsTumor Virus InfectionsViral LoadHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBKV

Identifiers

PMID39818950
PMCPMC11898770

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.