Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2025
A retrospective study on potential drug‒drug interactions in patients with severe asthma receiving biological therapy: a single-center experience.
Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polypharmacy in Elderly Patients Receiving First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Analysis of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions and Outcome.Oncology research · 2026Article
- Population pharmacokinetics modelling to predict DDI from zopiclone on clozapine in schizophrenia patients.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevalence of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) in adult patients with severe asthma on biological therapy and their clinical significance have not been fully addressed, thus the aim of this study was to investigate them.
methodsIn this retrospective observational study, patients who were diagnosed with severe asthma and to whom biological therapy was prescribed between September 2015 and December 2020, were enrolled. The study was conducted at the Department of Allergic and Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases, Clinic for Lung Diseases Jordanovac, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb. Data on demographic characteristics as well as concomitant medication were collected. The analysis of pDDIs was conducted via Lexicomp
results60 adult patients, 60% female and 40% male, with median age of 56.2 years, were enrolled. The incidence of pDDIs was 86.67%. Total number of pDDIs detected was 518, out of which 43.24%, 45%, 4.44% and 7.3% of clinical significance B, C, D and X. Interactions of level C, D and X were recorded in, as follows: 83.33%, 25% and 33.33% patients with an average of 4.66, 1.53 and 1.9 interactions per patient. Only 13.33% of the patients had none of the potential clinically significant DDI. Most drug pairs contained at least one antiasthmatic drug. Muscarinic receptor antagonists, oral corticosteroids, β2 agonists and methylxanthines showed potential of entering into clinically significant DDIs, while leukotriene antagonists and biologicals showed no potential for the above.
conclusionPrevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in patients with severe asthma on biological therapy is high. The majority of identified interactions have moderate to high level of clinical significance. Their identification, prevention and resolution could contribute to optimizing therapy, maximizing its therapeutic effect and avoiding undesirable adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.