Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819927›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

mHealth knowledge and usage in maternal healthcare delivery: perspectives and experiences of healthcare practitioners in Ghana.

Edward Kwabena Ameyaw, Padmore Adusei Amoah, Aikins Amoako Asiama, Pascal Agbadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edward Kwabena AmeyawInstitute of Policy Studies and School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China edwardameyaw@ln.edu.hk edmeyaw19@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6617-237X
Padmore Adusei AmoahInstitute of Policy Studies and School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China.
Aikins Amoako AsiamaInstitute of Policy Studies and School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China.
Pascal AgbadiDepartment of Sociology and Social Policy, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-2512

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study explored the knowledge and experiences of health practitioners regarding the use of mobile health (mHealth) for maternal healthcare delivery.

designUnderpinned by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, this study was an exploratory qualitative design involving in-depth interviews. Data collection occurred between July 2023 and January 2024.

settingThe study was conducted in three administrative regions in Ghana: Ashanti, Northern and Upper West regions. In each of these regions, one urban and one rural setting were selected to ascertain pertinent data from a wide range of maternity health practitioners and directors of health services operating within these regions.

participantsPurposive sampling technique was used to recruit 32 participants, who fall into two primary groups: directors of health services (n=9) and maternity health practitioners (23).

resultsThe findings revealed that maternal healthcare providers were familiar with and frequently used mHealth technologies (typically video calls/conferences and text messages). mHealth was considered a useful tool in maternal healthcare as it enhanced the efficiency of service delivery and improved practitioners' performance. mHealth facilities eased access to digital medical information, user-friendly interfaces and the ability to facilitate remote consultations. The willingness and ability of health professionals to use mHealth were conditioned by the nature of organisational and infrastructural support they received, including technical guidance and equipment availability. Thus, mHealth knowledge and use among maternal healthcare providers are predicated on personal, social and institutional conditions.

conclusionsMaternal healthcare providers are generally aware of the benefits of mHealth and are ready to use it when available. Thus, it is imperative that the Government of Ghana prioritise incorporation of mHealth into the existing and future maternal healthcare model to enhance care delivery and increase the prospects of achieving the first and second targets of the third Sustainable Development Goals. To ascertain greater gains from mHealth, it is worth acknowledging the varying factors that drive the adoption and effective use of mHealth, such as performance expectancy, ease of use, social influences and organisational support. Interventions aimed at enhancing mHealth integration should address these factors in a context-specific manner.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelMaternal Health ServicesTelemedicineAdultFemaleGhanaHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedPregnancyQualitative ResearchPostpartum WomenPregnant WomenPrimary Health CarePUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID39819927
PMCPMC11751998

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.