Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819929›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Development of a core patient-reported outcome set for use in HIV care at the individual patient level in Montreal: protocol for a two-phased multimethod project.

Kim Engler, David Lessard, Karine Lacombe, Romain Palich, Bertrand Lebouché

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06928961 (Implementation of a Patient Portal and Tailored Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Improve Health Problem Detection and Retention in HIV Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06928961 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Implementation of a Patient Portal and Tailored Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Improve Health Problem Detection and Retention in HIV Care: The DRHIVe Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreRan2025 to 2029Enrolled360ConditionsHIV, Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO), Screening, Patient PortalsArmsPatient portal with patient-reported outcome measure administration, appointment calendar and reminders, access to lab test results, and educational material
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kim EnglerCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada kimcengler@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8364-7421
David LessardCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1151-3763
Karine LacombeSorbonne University, Paris, France.
Romain PalichSorbonne University, Paris, France.
Bertrand LebouchéCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1273-9393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is international interest in using patient-reported outcome measures in HIV care to improve the well-being of people with HIV, but the prioritisation of specific outcomes and measures remains unclear. This project's objective is to engage both people with HIV and healthcare, social and community service providers to develop a French and English-language core set of patient-reported outcomes and measures for use in HIV care at the patient level in Montreal (Canada). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multimethod project will follow guidance from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative and involve two phases. Phase 1 will see the selection of the core set of outcomes (ie, the health concepts to target) and include a rapid scoping review to inform a Delphi study with a panel of 50 people with HIV and providers in Montreal. It will end with a multidisciplinary consensus meeting to make final decisions on the outcomes. Phase 2 will be devoted to choosing the measures to assess the selected outcomes. It will include a systematic search for instruments, an appraisal of the quality and feasibility of the identified instruments and a consensus meeting for the final selection. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics board (REB) approval was obtained on 9 December 2024, from the institutional REB of the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (reference number: 2024-9695). Findings will primarily be disseminated to (1) healthcare and social service providers through academic rounds and a provincial continuing education programme for HIV clinicians; (2) to people with HIV through partner community organisations and (3) a range of stakeholders at local, national and international conferences and through peer-reviewed publications.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresCanadaDelphi TechniqueHumansQuebecResearch DesignHIV & AIDSPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationPatient Reported Outcome Measures

Identifiers

PMID39819929
PMCPMC11751937

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.