ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the first trimester did not adversely impact perinatal and obstetric outcomes subsequent to in vitro fertilization with frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer with embryos generated from COVID‑19 infection during controlled ovarian stimulation: a retrospective study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the impact of first-trimester COVID-19 infection on the perinatal and obstetric outcomes following in vitro fertilization-frozen embryo transfer.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted at a university-affiliated IVF center. The infection group included women who contracted SARS-CoV-2 during the first trimester following frozen embryo transfer in China's initial pandemic wave that occurred from 7 December 2022 to 7 January 2023. The control group consisted of pregnant women from the pre-pandemic period, considering the widespread incidence of the disease among the Chinese population during such a large outbreak. The primary outcome was perinatal and obstetric parameters.
resultsA total of 346 pregnant women who tested positive for COVID-19 during the first trimester were included in the analysis, while the control group comprised 705 uninfected women (pre-COVID-19 controls). Perinatal outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birthweight, birthweight Z scores, macrosomia, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, and congenital malformations, showed no significant differences between the infected and control groups in both the unadjusted and confounder-adjusted logistic regression models. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the groups concerning obstetric complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, placenta previa, preterm premature rupture of the membrane, and mode of delivery.
conclusionThe current study demonstrated that contracting COVID-19 during the first trimester did not adversely impact future obstetric and perinatal outcomes following in vitro fertilization-frozen embryo transfer. This data holds practical significance and offers essential insights for reproductive specialists and obstetricians advising expectant mothers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.