Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821607›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

Antifungal susceptibility, clinical findings, and biofilm resistance of Fusarium species causing keratitis: a challenge for disease control.

Pedro de Freitas Santos Manzi de Souza, Edlâny Pinho Romão Milanez, Ana Raquel Colares de Andrade, Lua Silva, Maria Laína Silva, Ruan Costa Monteiro, Anderson Messias Rodrigues, Débora Castelo Branco de Souza Collares Maia, Glaucia Morgana de Melo Guedes, Rossana de Aguiar Cordeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pedro de Freitas Santos Manzi de SouzaFederal University of Ceará Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Edlâny Pinho Romão MilanezFederal University of Ceará Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Ana Raquel Colares de AndradeFederal University of Ceará Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Lua SilvaFederal University of Ceará Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Maria Laína SilvaFederal University of Ceará Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Ruan Costa MonteiroFederal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anderson Messias RodriguesFederal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Débora Castelo Branco de Souza Collares MaiaFederal University of Ceará Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Glaucia Morgana de Melo GuedesFederal University of Ceará Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Rossana de Aguiar CordeiroFederal University of Ceará Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. rossanacordeiro@ufc.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8386-2180

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 306295/2022-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusarium keratitis (FK) is an important clinical condition that can lead to blindness and eye loss, and is most commonly caused by the Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC). This study evaluated the susceptibility of planktonic cells and biofilms of FSSC (n = 7) and non-FSSC (n = 7) isolates obtained from patients with keratitis from a semi-arid tropical region to amphotericin B (AMB), natamycin (NAT), voriconazole (VRZ), efinaconazole (EFZ), and luliconazole (LCZ). Analysis of clinical data showed that trauma was the most common risk factor for FK patients. Disease onset was longer in non-FSSC group (3-30 days) than in the FSSC group (3-7 days). FSSC strains were less susceptible to AMB and VRZ than non-FSSC strains (p < 0.05). Susceptibility to NAT, LCZ and EFZ was similar between isolates of FSSC and non-FSSC groups. Overall, patients infected with non-FSSC showed a better response to antifungal treatment. Corneal transplantation was more common in patients infected with FSSC (3/7) than in those infected with non-FSSC (1/7). Mature biofilms showed a poor response to antifungal treatment. Patients infected with Fusarium strains capable of forming antifungal tolerant biofilms had more complex therapeutic management, requiring two antifungals and/or corneal transplantation (p < 0.05). This study highlights the importance of mycological diagnosis and the antifungal susceptibility testing in the clinical management of FK. The ability of Fusarium to form antifungal tolerant biofilms poses a challenge to clinicians and urges the development of new antibiofilm therapeutics.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsBiofilmsDrug Resistance, FungalFusariosisFusariumKeratitisAdultEye Infections, FungalFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntifungal AgentsEfinaconazoleFungal keratitisLuliconazole Fusarium solani species complex

Identifiers

PMID39821607
PMCPMC11885700

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.