Trial reportPediatrics2025
Pediatric Advance Care Planning and Adolescent Preparedness and Quality of Life: An RCT.
Trial report in Pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02693665 (Building Evidence for Effective Palliative/End of Life Care for Teens With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Building Evidence for Effective Palliative/End of Life Care for Teens With Cancer
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current status of and factors influencing advance care planning participation among adolescents and young adults with cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2026Pooled it
- "You Can Rest Knowing That We Know What You Want"-Longitudinal Advance Care Planning Discussions With Young Adults Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of Family-Centered Advance Care Planning for Teens With Cancer (FACE-TC) on adolescents' quality of life.
methodsA clinical trial randomized adolescent-family dyads at a 2:1 ratio to either FACE-TC or control. FACE-TC dyads received 3 weekly 60-minute sessions: Lyon Pediatric Advance Care Planning Survey; Next Steps: Respecting Choices; and Five Wishes. Generalized mixed-effect models evaluated efficacy at 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention measured by FACIT-SP-Ex-V4 (meaning/peace, faith) and PROMIS pediatric (anxiety; depressive symptoms; pain interference, fatigue). Fisher exact tests assessed decisional support and preparedness.
resultsAdolescents (n = 126) were mean age 17 years, 57% female, and 79% white. No significant differences were found between groups for faith or meaning/peace. At 12 months after intervention compared to control, FACE-TC increased anxiety (mean ratio 1.14; CI 1.04-1.25), depressive symptoms (mean ratio 1.12; CI 1.02-1.22), and pain interference (mean ratio 1.10; CI 1.00-1.20), but not at 3 or 6 months. FACE-TC increased fatigue at 3 months (mean ratio 1.13; CI 1.02-1.26), but not at 6 or 12 months. Compared to control, adolescents participating in FACE-TC agreed that "I feel prepared for the future" (76% vs 94%) and "I feel we are now on the same page" (76% vs 94%) at 3 months, but not at 12 months.
conclusionsThere were no significant differences in quality of life between groups until 1 year, except for fatigue. FACE-TC had late effects, increasing adolescents' anxiety, depressive symptoms, and pain interference. Reassessment at 1 year is clinically important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.