Observational studyJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2025
Identifying Drug Prescription in Newly Diagnosed Hypertension Patients in India.
Observational study in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated initial antihypertensive drug prescription patterns in Indian healthcare settings. An observational, cross-sectional, prospective prescription registry analyzed prescriptions for 4723 newly diagnosed hypertension patients. Additionally, it investigated the extent to which physicians adhered to either European or Indian hypertension guidelines. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were the most commonly prescribed drugs, given to 79% of patients, followed by calcium channel blockers (CCBs) at 55%. Diuretics and beta-blockers (BBs) were prescribed to 27% and 17% of patients, respectively. Monotherapy was administered to 35% of patients, while combination therapies were more prevalent, with dual therapy at 51% and regimens involving three or more drugs prescribed to 14%. Among multi-drug treatments (n = 3082, 65%), 98% received fixed-dose combination tablets. The most common combinations were ARB + CCB (26%), ARB + diuretic (12%), and ARB + CCB + diuretic (8%). Key predictors for an increasing number of prescribed drugs included statin use/dyslipidemia, age, blood pressure level, and diabetes. Non-adherence to hypertension guidelines was evident as 1364 patients classified from moderate to very high risk received monotherapy. Of these, 496 patients had grade 2 or 3 hypertension. Additionally, 88 patients received the undesirable combination of ACEi + ARB, and 267 (15.9%) type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients did not receive RAS-blockers (146 on monotherapy). The findings reveal a trend toward utilizing ARBs, CCBs, and combination tablets, indicating improved adherence to guidelines. However, a significant number of patients did not receive appropriate treatment, highlighting areas for improvement in prescription practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.