Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822294›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

A systematic review and meta-analysis of dual-task outcomes in subjective cognitive decline.

Talia Salzman, Erica Laurin, Chloe Thibault, Peter Farrell, Sarah Fraser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Talia SalzmanFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Human Kinetics University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2286-055X
Erica LaurinFaculty of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Chloe ThibaultFaculty of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Peter FarrellResearch Services University of Ottawa Library Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Sarah FraserFaculty of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) may represent a preclinical manifestation of objective cognitive impairment. This review consolidated existing findings to determine if dual-tasks objectively differentiate between individuals with SCD, motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, AgeLine, and CINAHL were systematically searched for dual-task studies examining older adults with SCD and analyzed using random-effects meta-analyses. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Within the SCD group, faster gait speed (SMD, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.57-2.13; Highlights: Evidence demonstrates that SCD may be a precursor to dementia.Faster dual-task gait speed was observed in the SCD group compared to MCI.Slower dual-task gait speed and shorter step length were observed within the SCD group.Dual-tasks may help differentiate between preclinical and clinical cognitive decline.Dual-tasks should be standardized and changes should be tracked longitudinally.

Indexed as

dementiadual taskgaitmild cognitive impairmentneuroimagingsubjective cognitive decline

Identifiers

PMID39822294
PMCPMC11736712

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.