ArticleMedical research archives2024
Hybrid care model: Combining telemedicine and office visits for diabetes management in older adults with type 1 diabetes.
Article in Medical research archives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of video consultations in type 1 diabetes patients treated with insulin pumps in the outpatient clinic: a randomised controlled trial.Diabetologia · 2026Trial
- TeleGlaukos: A Clinician-Led Adaptive Telemonitoring Platform for Hybrid Glaucoma Care.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Care for Type 1 Diabetes in Older Adulthood.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the use of hybrid (telehealth and in-person) care on visitation and glycaemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: In this retrospective study, we examined clinical characteristics, number of visits (telehealth and in-person) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics for older adults (≥65 years) with T1D from electronic health records during the pre-COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2019-March 1, 2020; in-person) and pandemic (September 1, 2020-August 31, 2021; hybrid) periods. Main outcomes were the number of visits and changes in glycaemic control (HbA1c), and in a sub-group of older adults using CGM, changes in CGM metrics between in-person and hybrid care. Results: We analysed data of 661 older adults with T1D (age 72±5 years). The hybrid care resulted in an increased number of annual diabetes visits (6.3 vs 4.2 visits/person) without change in glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.4% vs 7.2%) compared with in-person care alone. In the sub-group of 299 older adults with T1D using CGM, hybrid care compared with in-person care resulted in an improvement of time-in-range (70-180 mg/dL) (68% to 71%; p<0.001) without increasing hypoglycaemia (<70 mg/dL). Conclusion: Compared with in-person only visits, hybrid care maintained visit frequency and preserved glycaemic control measured as HbA1c. In a sub-group of older adults with T1D using CGM, time-in-range improved while time in hypoglycaemia did not change. These data suggest that a hybrid care model is efficacious in maintaining visitation and glycaemic control, and, as demonstrated in a sub-group of older adults with T1D using CGM, safe with respect to time in hypoglycaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.