ArticleCureus2024
Quantitative Assessment of Postural Influence on Lung Function Using Deformable Image Registration-Based Breath-Hold CT Ventilation Imaging.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to clarify which positions are beneficial for patients with pathological lung diseases, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, by obtaining lung ventilation and deformable vector field (DVF) images using Deformable Image Registration (DIR). Methods Thirteen healthy volunteers (5 female, 8 male) provided informed consent to participate to observe changes in normal lungs. DIR imaging was processed using the B-spline algorithm to obtain BH-CTVI (inhale, exhale) in four body positions (supine, prone, right lateral, left lateral) using DIR-based breath-hold CT ventilation imaging (BH-CTVI). DVF imaging was created through DIR-based BH-CTVI, which obtained the displacement vector from expiration to inspiration for each lung lobe. Results In the DIR images for each body position, the areas with Jacobian values in the 75th percentile or higher, indicating highly functional areas, were distributed on the side of the patient in contact with the ground. DVF images showed the abdominal displacement vector to be oriented from dorsal to ventral in the supine position. However, in the prone position, the displacement vectors were nearly parallel to the ground, directed from head to feet, indicating that lung motion was unaffected by gravity. Conclusion We demonstrated that the prone position allows for lung ventilation with the least gravitational load compared with the supine, right lateral decubitus, and left lateral decubitus positions, based on a comparison of DIR-based BH-CTVI when the positions were converted. It is important to include the evaluation of DVF images, in addition to ventilation images, when assessing lung function using DIR-based BH-CTVI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.