ArticlePloS one2025
Experiences and perceptions of respectful maternity care among mothers during childbirth in health facilities of Eastern province of Rwanda: An appreciative inquiry.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Supportive Care Shapes Women's Childbirth Satisfaction: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Factors associated with respectful maternity care reported by patients in selected health facilities in Musanze District, Rwanda: a facility-based cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- The effect of respectful maternity care on the perception of traumatic birth among mothers in southern Türkiye.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe World Health Organization (WHO) has emphasized the importance of ensuring respectful and dignified childbirth experiences. However, many countries, including Rwanda, have documented negative experiences during childbirth. Identifying best practices can help uncover sustainable solutions for resource-limited settings rather than focusing solely on the challenges and negative aspects. This study aimed to explore and describe how mothers in Rwanda's Eastern Province perceived and valued their childbirth experiences during their most recent labour and delivery.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative, exploratory, descriptive study. Purposive sampling targeted mothers who reported receiving respectful care during labour and childbirth. We selected 30 mothers from five hospitals in the Eastern Province of Rwanda. Data collection involved in-depth interviews (IDIs) following the first four stages of the Appreciative Inquiry (AI) 5D cycle. We employed the thematic analysis and used NVivo 12 to organize codes and develop a codebook.
resultsThree main themes, each with subthemes, emerged from the analysis. The first theme, appreciated care, included compassionate care and emotional support, autonomy and self-determination, timely care, privacy and confidentiality, and a supportive environment. The second theme perceived respectful care, addressed the meaning of respectful care and the sources of the participants' satisfaction. The third theme, strategies for improvement, focused on increasing women's self-control, sustaining providers' positive behaviours, and fostering caring leadership. Participants described receiving compassionate, empathetic, and dignified care, with timely attention to their needs. They expressed satisfaction with the services provided, noting that healthcare providers were kind, polite, and dedicated, often going beyond their duties. Mothers recommended to be more involved in decision-making, maintaining an optimal environment for childbirth, and enhancing community trust and professionalism in maternity care. They also acknowledged their responsibility to ensure proper birth spacing.
conclusionThe aspects of care the participants appreciated could be consistently maintained and promoted. There is a need to build on the progress made in delivering RMC to strengthen community trust and elevate expectations. Given the sensitive nature of RMC, we recommend conducting further studies using the Appreciative Inquiry approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.