ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2025
Two minutes is sufficient to characterize the viscoelastic properties of the human lower birth canal during the first stage of labor.
Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe lower birth canal is the final constriction through which a fetal head must pass for delivery. Unfortunately, injuries to the lower birth canal tissues occur in up to 19 % of first-time vaginal deliveries due to the 300 % stretch required.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of data from 56 healthy nullipara recorded by a lower birth canal dilator during the first stage of labor. A four parameter Fractional Zener rheological Model was used to characterize the canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor. We tested the (null) hypothesis that the Model constants identified during the initial 20 s ramp-and-5-min-hold dilation from 40 to 55 mm will not accurately predict the final hoop tension after 60 min of slower dilation.
findingsThe null hypothesis was rejected in that when the four Model parameters were calculated for all nullipara from the 20-s-ramp-and-5-min-hold data, the relative fit error was 8 ± 4 %, and the relative prediction error after 60 min of dilation was 10 ± 5 %. Furthermore, when the Model constants were instead calculated from the 20 s ramp and only the initial 90 s of the 5-min-hold, the error was still acceptable: 13 ± 4 % for relative fit and 13 ± 18 % for relative prediction.
interpretationTwo minutes is sufficient to characterize canal viscoelastic properties during the first stage of labor and identify those with stiffer tissues at higher risk for a pelvic floor injury during delivery. This could form the basis for a clinical test predicting injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.