Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39826071›Full record

ReviewBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2025

State-of-the-Art Liver Cancer Organoids: Modeling Cancer Stem Cell Heterogeneity for Personalized Treatment.

Julien Giron-Michel, Maël Padelli, Estelle Oberlin, Hind Guenou, Jean-Charles Duclos-Vallée

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biobanked Liver Organoids: A Roadmap for Precision Hepatology.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julien Giron-MichelINSERM UMR-S-MD 1197, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France. julien.giron-michel@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6613-6099
Maël PadelliINSERM UMR-S-MD 1197, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3103-1294
Estelle OberlinINSERM UMR-S-MD 1197, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8200-9548
Hind GuenouINSERM UMR-S-MD 1197, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3906-2519
Jean-Charles Duclos-ValléeOrsay-Vallée Campus, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8931-9186

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver cancer poses a global health challenge with limited therapeutic options. Notably, the limited success of current therapies in patients with primary liver cancers (PLCs) may be attributed to the high heterogeneity of both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCCs) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCAs). This heterogeneity evolves over time as tumor-initiating stem cells, or cancer stem cells (CSCs), undergo (epi)genetic alterations or encounter microenvironmental changes within the tumor microenvironment. These modifications enable CSCs to exhibit plasticity, differentiating into various resistant tumor cell types. Addressing this challenge requires urgent efforts to develop personalized treatments guided by biomarkers, with a specific focus on targeting CSCs. The lack of effective precision treatments for PLCs is partly due to the scarcity of ex vivo preclinical models that accurately capture the complexity of CSC-related tumors and can predict therapeutic responses. Fortunately, recent advancements in the establishment of patient-derived liver cancer cell lines and organoids have opened new avenues for precision medicine research. Notably, patient-derived organoid (PDO) cultures have demonstrated self-assembly and self-renewal capabilities, retaining essential characteristics of their respective in vivo tissues, including both inter- and intratumoral heterogeneities. The emergence of PDOs derived from PLCs serves as patient avatars, enabling preclinical investigations for patient stratification, screening of anticancer drugs, efficacy testing, and thereby advancing the field of precision medicine. This review offers a comprehensive summary of the advancements in constructing PLC-derived PDO models. Emphasis is placed on the role of CSCs, which not only contribute significantly to the establishment of PDO cultures but also faithfully capture tumor heterogeneity and the ensuing development of therapy resistance. The exploration of PDOs' benefits in personalized medicine research is undertaken, including a discussion of their limitations, particularly in terms of culture conditions, reproducibility, and scalability.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaLiver NeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsOrganoidsPrecision MedicineAnimalsHumansTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39826071
PMCPMC11906529

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.