ArticleScientific reports2025
Age- and sex-adjusted CT-based reference values for temporal muscle thickness, cross-sectional area and radiodensity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Value of temporal muscle thickness in predicting outcomes of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Temporalis Muscle Thickness as a Prognostic Marker in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Reduced Temporal Muscle Thickness Is Associated with Increased Postoperative Complications After Cranioplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association between temporal muscle morphology based on MRI and muscle mass and strength in healthy young adults: a cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Association of sarcopenia with survival and treatment response in brain metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Temporal muscle measurements as predictor for outcome in a cohort of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscle mass has been traditionally assessed by measuring paraspinal muscle areas at the level of the third lumbar vertebra on computed tomography (CT). Neurological or neurosurgical patients seldom undergo CT scans of the lumbar region. Instead, temporal muscle thickness (TMT), cross-sectional area (TMA) and radiodensity measured from head CT scans are readily available measures of muscle mass and quality in these patient cohorts. The purpose of this retrospective study was to establish CT-based reference values for TMT, TMA and radiodensity for each decade of age from 0 to 100 years normalized by age and sex, and to define cut-off values for subjects at risk for sarcopenia as defined by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP). Subjects diagnosed with a concussion at the Oulu University Hospital between January 2014 and December 2022 (n = 9254) were identified to obtain a reference population. Subjects with significant pre-existing co-morbidities were excluded. TMT, TMA and radiodensity were measured, measurement reliability was quantified, and sex-adjusted reference values were calculated for each age decade. Quantile regression was used to model age-related changes in muscle morphomics. A total of 500 subjects [250 (50.0%) males] with a mean age of 49.2 ± 27.9 years were evaluated. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was almost perfect for TMT and TMA, and substantial-to-almost perfect for radiodensity. The mean TMT, TMA and radiodensity were 5.2 ± 1.9 mm, 284 ± 159 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.