Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39828520›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025

Recovery trajectories after major abdominal surgery: A retrospective pooled cohort study.

Jared Ou-Young, Colin Royse, Sandy Clarke-Errey, Doa El-Ansary, Bernhard Riedel, James Griffiths, Andrea Bowyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jared Ou-YoungDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Colin RoyseDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sandy Clarke-ErreyStatistical Consulting Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Doa El-AnsaryDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bernhard RiedelDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative Medicine, and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
James GriffithsDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Andrea BowyerDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecovery from major surgery can be difficult to predict given the many factors involved in treating disease and restoring preoperative function. Postoperative recovery metrics such as length of stay, complications, and mortality are typically described. However, large data quantities for patient-reported recovery are scarce. In this retrospective study, we aimed to describe the multidimensional recovery trajectory of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery 4-8 weeks after surgery and explore factors related to incomplete overall recovery.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed pooled cohort data of adults undergoing elective major abdominal surgery between 2018 and 2024 across three tertiary-level hospitals. Recovery was measured at postoperative days 1, 3, 7, 14, weeks 4-8, and 3 months using the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PostopQRS). Physiological, nociceptive, emotive, activities of daily living (ADL), and cognitive domains were assessed, with recovery defined as a return to, or improvement of, preoperative baseline levels. Overall recovery was defined as recovery in all domains. Length of stay was assessed for patients who recovered overall, or did not recover, at postoperative weeks 4-8.

resultsSix hundred and fifty-three patients were included, with mean (SD) age of 57.8 (14.4) years. Of these, 36% were aged ≥65 years and 58% were male. The incidence of overall recovery at postoperative week 4-8 was 42%. Domain-level recovery at postoperative weeks 4-8 was 63% for nociception, 81% for emotion, 82% for ADLs, and 83% for cognition. Patients failing to achieve overall recovery at weeks 4-8 had longer mean (SD) lengths of stay compared to those who recovered (11.3 (10.3) vs. 7.3 (7.1) days, p < .001).

conclusionsThe incidence of overall recovery at postoperative week 4-8 was 42%. Patients with incomplete overall recovery had longer lengths of stay. Multidimensional strategies to improve the recovery trajectory warrant further investigation. EDITORIAL COMMENT: Major surgical procedures are often followed by a lengthy and difficult recovery period. Traditional measures such as mortality and complications are usually analysed, but this 653-patient study investigated patient-reported recovery scores after major abdominal surgery. Novel findings include that only 42% of patients have recovered fully in all recovery domains at weeks 4-8, and these patients also had longer hospital stays. Preoperative risk factors were analysed for associations with recovery trajectories.

Indexed as

AbdomenElective Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsmajor abdominal surgerymultidimensional recoveryquality of recoveryrisk factortrajectory

Identifiers

PMID39828520
PMCPMC11743424

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.