ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025
Nanotechnology-based biomedical devices in the cancer diagnostics and therapy.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graphene Oxide (GO) and Gold Nanoparticles (AuNP) Facilitated Electrochemical Biosensing for Lung Cancer Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- A bibliometric analysis of the evolution of nanotechnology research in precision theranostics for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Eco-friendly synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Gracilaria gracilis with antioxidant potential and biocompatibility.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanisms and clinical significance of perineural invasion in malignancies: the pivotal role of tumor-associated Schwann cells in cancer progression and metastasis.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Research progress on NUSAP1 and its role in digestive system neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanotechnology has significantly transformed the field of cancer diagnostics and therapeutics by introducing advanced biomedical devices. These nanotechnology-based devices exhibit remarkable capabilities in detecting and treating various cancers, addressing the limitations of traditional approaches, such as limited specificity and sensitivity. This review aims to explore the advancements in nanotechnology-driven biomedical devices, emphasizing their role in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Through a comprehensive analysis, we evaluate various nanotechnology-based devices across different cancer types, detailing their diagnostic and therapeutic effectiveness. The review also discusses FDA-approved nanotechnology products, patents, and regulatory trends, highlighting the innovation and clinical impact in oncology. Nanotechnology-based devices, including nanobots, smart pills, and multifunctional nanoparticles, enable precise targeting and treatment, reducing adverse effects on healthy tissues. Devices such as DNA-based nanorobots, quantum dots, and biodegradable stents offer noninvasive diagnostic and therapeutic options, showing high efficacy in preclinical and clinical settings. FDA-approved products underscore the acceptance of these technologies. Nanotechnology-based biomedical devices offer a promising future for oncology, with the potential to revolutionize cancer care through early detection, targeted treatment, and minimal side effects. Continued research and technological improvements are essential to fully realize their potential in personalized cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39828813What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.