ArticleASIDE internal medicine2025
The Impact of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among UK Women: An Obesity-Adjusted Analysis.
Article in ASIDE internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Just lose weight": weight-based medical bias and experiential expertise in intracranial hypertension.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Epidemiological Patterns, Treatment Response, and Metabolic Correlations of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A United States-Based Study From 1990 to 2024.ASIDE internal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is known to elevate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but the extent to which obesity and IIH-specific factors contribute to this risk is not well understood. WE aim to separate the effects of obesity from IIH-specific factors on the risk of stroke and CVD, building on previous findings that indicate a two-fold increase in cardiovascular events in women with IIH compared to BMI-matched controls. Methods: An obesity-adjusted risk analysis was conducted using Indirect Standardization based on data from a cohort study by Adderley et al., which included 2,760 women with IIH and 27,125 matched healthy controls from The Health Improvement Network (THIN). Advanced statistical models were employed to adjust for confounding effects of obesity and determine the risk contributions of IIH to ischemic stroke and CVD, independent of obesity. Four distinct models explored the interactions between IIH, obesity, and CVD risk. Results: The analysis showed that IIH independently contributes to increased cardiovascular risk beyond obesity alone. Risk ratios for cardiovascular outcomes were significantly higher in IIH patients compared to controls within similar obesity categories. Notably, a synergistic effect was observed in obese IIH patients, with a composite CVD risk ratio of 6.19 (95% CI: 4.58-8.36, p<0.001) compared to non-obese controls. Conclusions: This study underscores a significant, independent cardiovascular risk from IIH beyond obesity. The findings advocate for a shift in managing IIH to include comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment and mitigation. Further research is required to understand the mechanisms and develop specific interventions for this group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.