Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830757›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024

Machine learning-based radiomics for guiding lymph node dissection in clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.

Hao Zhang, Yuan Li, Sikai Wu, Yue Peng, Yang Liu, Shugeng Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hao Zhang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuan Li *Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Sikai Wu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yue PengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shugeng GaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preoperative assessment of lymph node status is critical in managing lung cancer, as it directly impacts the surgical approach and treatment planning. However, in clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), determining lymph node metastasis (LNM) is often challenging due to the limited sensitivity of conventional imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT). This study aimed to establish an effective radiomics prediction model using multicenter data for early assessment of LNM risk in patients with clinical stage I LUAD. The goal is to provide a basis for formulating lymph node dissection strategies before surgery in early-stage lung cancer patients. Methods: A total of 578 patients with LUAD from three medical centers [Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CCAM), the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (1CMU), and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital (BCYH)] who underwent preoperative chest CT were divided into three groups, the training group (n=336), the testing group (n=167), and the independent validation group (n=75). The records of 1,316 radiomics features of each primary tumor were extracted. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to reduce the data dimensionality, select features, and construct the prediction models. Results: In the training group, the area under the curve (AUC) for the clinical model, radiomics model, and composite model were 0.820, 0.871, and 0.883, respectively. In the testing group, the AUC for the clinical model, radiomics model, and composite model were 0.897, 0.915, and 0.934, respectively. In the validation set, the AUC of the radiomics model was the highest at 0.870, while the composite model and clinical model had AUCs of 0.841 and 0.710, respectively. The results of the Delong test showed that the AUCs of the radiomics model and composite model were significantly higher than those of the clinical model in both the training and validation groups. The decision curve analysis showed that the radiomics nomogram was clinically useful. Conclusions: This study developed and validated a radiomics prediction model, which enables easy LNM prediction in stage I LUAD patients. This model provides a basis for formulating lymph node dissection strategies before surgery and helps to better determine the tumor node metastasis stage of the early-stage LUAD.

Indexed as

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)lymph node metastasis (LNM)prediction modelradiomics

Identifiers

PMID39830757
PMCPMC11736574

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.