ArticleHealth science reports2025
Unlocking the Healing Potential: A Comprehensive Review of Ecology and Biology of Medical-Grade Honey in Wound Management and Tissue Regeneration.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Honey has long been studied for its healing abilities in wound care. This narrative review examines its properties and their impact on wound healing, particularly its ability to accelerate wound closure and promote tissue regeneration. The review focuses on how honey's botanical origins affect its medical properties and wound-healing capabilities. Finally, clinical studies on honey's effectiveness in wound healing were reviewed compared to traditional treatments. Methods: Relevant keywords were searched in databases, yielding 1250 documents. After excluding nonrelevant sources, 450 documents were refined, and 167 articles were selected based on thematic alignment and originality. Data extraction focused on study design, intervention details, and outcomes, with quality assessed using standardized criteria. The study adhered to CONSORT and SANRA guidelines to ensure methodological rigor and reporting transparency. Results: Honey-based medical products have demonstrated significant antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and tissue-regenerative properties, making them highly effective in improving wound healing outcomes, particularly in chronic and burn wounds. These products have also been shown to reduce infection rates and hospital stays. While some studies have reported positive outcomes in accelerating the healing process, others have found no significant difference compared to conventional treatments. Conclusion: Medical-grade honey (MGH) holds potential for wound care due to its versatility, though variations in its composition present challenges. Further research is needed to optimize its clinical use. The effectiveness of MGH in wound healing remains debated, with mixed results from trials. Genetic modification of bees to enhance MGH's properties could make it more competitive against conventional treatments. Honey-based medications could reduce costs, improve energy efficiency, and have minimal side effects. Rigorous research is necessary to determine optimal use and fully unlock MGH's potential, which could revolutionize wound management globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.