Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39831591›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in infectious diseases2025

The future approach for the management of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Giusy Tiseo, Marco Falcone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The global epidemiology of MRSA.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Review
  2. Managing skin infections in burn patients: principles and pitfalls.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giusy TiseoInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Marco Falcone

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo discuss the new available options for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and how to implement in the clinical practice innovative approaches for their management. RECENT

findingsThe availability of long-acting antibiotics, including dalbavancin and oritavancin, changed the approach to patients with ABSSSI. Direct discharge from the emergency department and early discharge from the hospital should be considered in patients with ABSSSI. Despite limited data about different bactericidal properties, the choice between dalbavancin and oritavacin is usually based on patients' characteristics and comorbidities. Delafloxacin and omadacycline are other options and have the advantage to be available for both intravenous and oral formulations, allowing a sequential therapy and switch from intravenous to oral treatment in clinically stable patients. Further studies should elucidate the profile of patients who may beneficiate from these drugs. SUMMARY: Early discharge from the hospital should be considered in patients with ABSSSI at a high risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and in vulnerable patients for which hospitalization may have detrimental consequences. In elderly individuals, patients with diabetes mellitus, oncological people who need for continuing their healthcare pathway, this approach may reduce complications and costs related to hospitalization.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsSkin Diseases, BacterialHumansLipoglycopeptidesTeicoplaninVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsdalbavancinLipoglycopeptidesoritavancinTeicoplaninVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID39831591
PMCPMC12036772

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.