Evidence mapPaperPMID 39831778Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2025

Bacteria as Precision Tools for Cancer Therapy.

Carmen Michán, José Prados, Juan-Luis Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carmen MichánDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario CeiA3, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2921-0987
José PradosDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Center of Biomedical Research (CIBM), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (IBS) de Granada; Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Juan-Luis RamosEstación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8731-7435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery at the end of the 20th century of genes that induce cell death revolutionised the biocontaintment of genetically manipulated bacteria for environmental or agricultural applications. These bacterial 'killer' genes were then assayed for their potential to target and control malignant cells in human cancers. The identification of the bacteriomes in different human organs and tissues, coupled with the observation that bacteria tend to accumulate near tumours, has opened new avenues for anti-cancer strategies. This progress, along with recent insights into how cancer cells evade immune response, has prompted innovative therapeutic approaches. Tumour microenvironments are typically nutrient-rich, characterised by low oxygen tensions and very resistant to immune responses. Two recent studies in MBT highlight the promise of using Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli as vectors in novel cancer treatments. Engineered S. typhimurium strains can generate adjuvant flagellin-antigen complexes that function as in situ vaccines, hence increasing the immunogenic responses within tumour environment. Similarly, gut E. coli can be used as vectors to targert tumour cells in colon cancer, enabling both diagnostic applications and localised treatments. Both approaches hold significant potential to improve patient survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliNeoplasmsSalmonella typhimuriumBiological TherapyHumans

Identifiers

PMID39831778
PMCPMC11744777

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.