SynthesisBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional shear wave elastography and point shear wave elastography in identifying different stages of liver fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Use of Ultrasound-Based Elastography Techniques in Liver Fibrosis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Dual-mode 3D shear wave elastography with qualitative and quantitative assessment improves diagnosis of inguinal lymph node metastasis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Overcoming the barriers in the screening, diagnosis, and follow-up of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Imaging-based fibrosis assessment and risk stratification in MASLD.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- EUS point shear-wave elastography: A novel approach for noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2-D SWE) and point shear wave elastography (pSWE) in detecting liver fibrosis stages in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), a comprehensive search was conducted across four databases up to February 9, 2024. A bivariate random-effects model was used to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the methods. After screening, 13 studies involving pSWE included 1527 patients, while nine studies involving 2-D SWE included 1088 patients. The areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves for diagnosing significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2), advanced fibrosis (F ≥ 3), and cirrhosis (F = 4) using pSWE and 2-D SWE were as follows: 0.84 (95% CI 0.80-0.87), 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.93), and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.95) for pSWE; 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.86) 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.88), and 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.91) for 2-D SWE, respectively. The pooled sensitivity for pSWE and 2-D SWE for stages F ≥ 2, F ≥ 3, and F = 4 were 0.71 (95% CI 0.63-0.78), 0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.88), and 0.81 (95% CI 0.63-0.91) for pSWE, and 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.84), 0.80 (95% CI 0.72-0.87), and 0.92 (95% CI 0.75-0.98) for 2-D SWE, respectively. The pooled specificity of pSWE and 2-D SWE for these stages were 0.83 (95% CI 0.76-0.88), 0.87 (95% Cl: 0.81-0.92), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.94) for pSWE, and 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.84), 0.76 (95% CI 0.69-0.82), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.85) for 2-D SWE, respectively. In conclusion, both 2-D SWE and pSWE demonstrated high diagnostic performance in identifying various stages of liver fibrosis in MASLD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.