ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Celiac disease: an update].
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Celiac disease is one of the most common lifelong autoimmune disorders and is currently understood as a genetically determined immune intolerance to gluten. In genetically predisposed individuals, the consumption of gluten, along with additional environmental factors, triggers an immunological reaction in the small intestinal epithelium, leading to the destruction of the mucosal architecture with villous atrophy. This can be asymptomatic, but may also cause a wide range of symptoms and lead to systemic complications, such as osteoporosis or infertility. The only treatment is a lifelong, strictly gluten-free diet. Despite advances in diagnostics, many cases remain unrecognized. Diagnosis is based on the serological detection of autoantibodies against tissue transglutaminase 2 (tTG-IgA) and, if necessary, a small intestinal biopsy. Population-wide screening during childhood or adolescence, as legally introduced in Italy in September 2023, could promote early detection and prevent long-term complications. For the monitoring of diagnosed patients, regular clinical check-ups and serological testing are standard practice. In cases of persistent symptoms or risk factors for ongoing villous atrophy, a follow-up duodenal histology examination is recommended. Persistent symptoms despite adherence to a gluten-free diet are often due to continued gluten exposure; however, alternative causes must also be ruled out. In cases of severe malabsorptive symptoms, the rare condition of refractory celiac disease should be considered, with management carried out in specialized centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39831902What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.