Evidence mapPaperPMID 39832073Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2025

Psychological symptoms, quality of life and dyadic relations in family members of intensive care survivors: a multicentre, prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Sumeet Rai, Dale M Needham, Rhonda Brown, Teresa Neeman, Krishnaswamy Sundararajan, Arvind Rajamani, Rakshit Panwar, Mary Nourse, Frank M P van Haren, Imogen Mitchell and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Beyond the ICU: family resilience and emotional turmoil after intensive care - a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sumeet RaiSchool of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Sumeet.Rai@act.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6996-2449
Dale M NeedhamJohn Hopkins University School of Medicine and School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rhonda BrownResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Teresa NeemanBiological Data Science Institute, College of Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Krishnaswamy SundararajanIntensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Arvind RajamaniIntensive Care Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Sydney, Australia.
Rakshit PanwarIntensive Care Unit, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton, Australia.
Mary NourseIntensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra Health Services, Canberra, Australia.
Frank M P van HarenSchool of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Imogen MitchellSchool of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
PRICE study investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is scarce literature evaluating long term psychological or Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes in family members of ICU survivors, who have not experienced invasive ventilation. The objective was to compare long-term psychological symptoms and QoL outcomes in family members of intubated versus non-intubated ICU survivors and to evaluate dyadic relationships between paired family members and survivors.

methodsProspective, multicentre cohort study among four medical-surgical ICUs in Australia. Adult family members of ICU survivors and family-survivor dyads had follow-up assessments (3 and 12 months after ICU discharge), using Impact of Event Scale-Revised; Depression, Anxiety Stress Scales-21; EQ-5D-5L. Dyadic relationships examined associations of psychological symptoms or QoL impairments.

resultsOf 144 family members (75% female, 54% partners/spouses) recruited, 59% cared for previously intubated survivors. Overall, 83% (110/132) of eligible family members completed ≥ 1 follow-up. In family members of intubated vs non-intubated survivors, clinically significant psychological symptoms (PTSD/depression/anxiety) were reported by 48% vs 33% at 3-months (p = 0.15); and 39% vs 25% at 12-months (p = 0.23). Family self-rated their QoL with a mean score of 83 (SD 13) on a visual analogue scale (range 0-100), and > 30% reported problems in pain/discomfort or anxiety/depression domains at 12-months. Family members were more likely to have persistent psychological symptoms of PTSD [OR 4.9, 95% CI (1.47-16.1), p = 0.01] or depression [OR 14.6, 95% CI (2.9-72.6), p = 0.001]; or QoL domain problems with pain/discomfort [OR 6.5, 95% CI (1.14-36.8), p = 0.03] or anxiety/depression [OR 3.5, 95% CI (1.02-12.1), p = 0.04], when the paired survivor also reported the same symptoms.

conclusionsAlmost one-third of the family members of ICU survivors reported persistent psychological symptoms and QoL problems at 12-months. There was a noticeable dyad effect with family members more likely to have persistent symptoms of PTSD, depression, and problems in QoL domains when the paired ICU survivors experienced similar symptoms. The family members of non-intubated ICU survivors had an equal propensity to develop long-term psychological distress and should be included in long-term outcome studies. Future recovery intervention trials should be aimed at ICU family-survivor dyads. Trial registration ACTRN12615000880549.

Indexed as

DyadsIntensive carePost-intensive care syndrome-familyPsychologyQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID39832073
PMCPMC11746989

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.