Evidence mapPaperPMID 39832779Full record

ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2025

Determinants of adherence to obesity medication: A narrative review.

Arya M Sharma, Susie Birney, Michael Crotty, Nick Finer, Gabriella Segal-Lieberman, Verónica Vázquez-Velázquez, Bernard Vrijens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Determinants of adherence to obesity medication: A narrative review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arya M SharmaDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9360-6519
Susie BirneyIrish Coalition for People Living with Obesity, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael CrottyMy Best Weight Clinic, Blackrock, Dublin, Ireland.
Nick FinerNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2468-6804
Gabriella Segal-LiebermanDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Verónica Vázquez-VelázquezDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Obesity and Eating Disorders Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4050-0152
Bernard VrijensAARDEX Group, Liège, Belgium; Department of Public Health, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

Novo NordiskNovo Nordisk A/S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of obesity, complex nature of this chronic disease, and risks of developing obesity-related comorbidities outline the need for sustainable and effective management for people living with obesity. In addition to behavioral interventions, obesity medications (OMs) are increasingly considered an integral part of management of people living with obesity. OM adherence is essential to achieve the health benefits of these medications. Adherence to medications, defined as the process by which patients take their medications as prescribed, is determined by a range of factors and can be broken down into phases: initiation, implementation, and persistence (the persistence phase includes discontinuation/stopping treatment). Obesity-specific challenges exist to optimize OM adherence, which may explain varying OM adherence compared with medication for other chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and osteoporosis). However, lessons can be learned from other chronic diseases to improve OM adherence, for example from type 2 diabetes and hypertension. This review aims to provide practical guidance for identifying OM- and obesity-specific determinants of adherence and discusses adherence determinants per adherence phase and obesity management phase (weight gain, weight loss, and weight stabilization/regain). This practical guidance will assist with developing obesity-specific interventions to improve OM adherence. PRACTITIONER POINTS: OMs are increasingly considered as an integral part of obesity management; however, like with all chronic disease medications, low adherence to these medications is often observed, impacting their therapeutic effect. Adherence to obesity medication can be affected at any phase of obesity management (weight gain, weight loss, and weight stabilization/regain) so considering the disease phase can help identify potential reasons for low adherence. Future initiatives to improve adherence to obesity medication should be a key focus of discussions at each opportunity with healthcare professionals, including thorough evaluation and targeted education, all in a supportive and stigma-free manner.

Indexed as

Anti-Obesity AgentsMedication AdherenceObesityHumansAnti-Obesity Agentsmedication adherenceobesityobesity medicationrecommendation

Identifiers

PMID39832779
PMCPMC11964794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.