ArticleBMJ open2025
Is first-line treatment with polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (pola-R-CHP) for previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cost-effective in China? A cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Polatuzumab Vedotin in Combination With Rituximab and CHP (R-CHP) Versus Rituximab and CHOP (R-CHOP) in Previously Untreated Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (ZUMA-7)
A Global Randomized Multicenter Phase 3 Trial of JCAR017 Compared to Standard of Care in Adult Subjects With High-risk, Second-line, Transplant-eligible Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (TRANSFORM).
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of ibrutinib plus venetoclax for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma in China and the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: perspectives from the United States and China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (pola-R-CHP) in CD20-positive patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in China.
designA Markov model was constructed to analyse the cost-effectiveness of two strategies in CD20-positive patients with previously untreated DLBCL over a lifetime horizon: (1) pola-R-CHP and (2) rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP). The clinical outcomes were obtained from the POLARIX(NCT03274492), SCHOLAR-1, ZUMA-7(NCT03391466) and TRANSFORM(NCT03575351) trials. Costs were derived from the Chinese official websites and published literature, and utility values were obtained from the published literature. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at triple the 2023 Chinese per capita gross domestic product of US$38 042.49/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Uncertainty was addressed using sensitivity analyses. The scenario analyses were also conducted.
settingChinese healthcare system perspective.
participantsA hypothetical cohort of adult patients presenting with CD20-positive, patients with previously untreated DLBCL.
interventionsPola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP.
main outcome measuresThe main outcomes of the study were QALYs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net-health benefit (INHB).
resultsIn China, the ICER and INHB of pola-R-CHP compared with R-CHOP were US$77 036.33/QALY and -1.11 QALYs, respectively. The ICER was above the WTP threshold. Outcomes were most responsive to the price of pola. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that pola-R-CHP had a low probability of being cost-effective under the current WTP threshold. The scenario analyses demonstrated that when the price of pola fell by more than 32.5% to less than US$33.19/mg, the economic probability of pola-R-CHP was greater than 50% in previously untreated CD20-positive patients with DLBCL in China.
conclusionsPola-R-CHP is not cost-effective in the first-line treatment for previously untreated CD20-positive DLBCL in China. A value-based price for the cost of pola is less than US$33.19/mg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.