ArticleBMJ open2025
Chronic kidney disease progression in patients with previous type 2 diabetes and/or hypertension: a population-based cohort study from primary care in Spain.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gut dysbiosis and constipation in patients with end-stage renal disease: pathogenic associations and therapeutic interventions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate whether between hypertension and type 2 diabetes (T2D)-established drivers of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression-one might be more strongly associated with CKD progression than the other.
designCohort study using a primary care database (electronic health records).
settingPrimary care in Catalonia, Spain.
participants438 273 patients with CKD identified from the Information System for Research in Primary Care database in Catalonia (2007-2017) and stratified into four mutually exclusive groups based on the presence/absence of hypertension and/or T2D. Distribution of the CKD study cohort was as follows: CKD with hypertension (51.1%), CKD with T2D (3.9%), CKD with hypertension and T2D (32.8%), CKD without hypertension and T2D (12.2%). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were followed up to identify the occurrence of severe kidney impairment (SKI) and kidney failure (kidney replacement therapy/estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 mL/min/1.73 m
resultsCompared with the CKD without hypertension and T2D group, adjusted sHRs (95% CIs) for SKI/kidney failure were 1.77 (1.65 to 1.89) for CKD with hypertension and T2D, 1.50 (1.41 to 1.59) for CKD with hypertension and 1.21 (1.09 to 1.34) for CKD with T2D, and for kidney failure were 1.24 (1.10 to 1.39) for CKD with hypertension, 0.74 (0.61 to 0.90) for CKD with T2D and 1.09 (0.96 to 1.24) for CKD with hypertension and T2D. The strongest risk factors for CKD progression were low eGFR and albuminuria, even at mild-moderate levels.
conclusionsHypertension could be associated with an equal/greater risk of CKD progression as T2D. Efforts to slow CKD progression should target both patients with hypertension and T2D, focusing on the identification, close monitoring and effective management of albuminuria and reduced eGFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.