Evidence mapPaperPMID 39833008Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2025

What are the perceptions and experiences of adults using mobile applications for self-management in diabetes? A systematic review.

Kalthum Patail, Hui Hsuan Pai, Geva Greenfield, Benedict Hayhoe, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luisa Neves, Henock B Taddese

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kalthum PatailPrimary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK meditalents@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1736-7177
Hui Hsuan PaiImperial College London, London, UK.
Geva GreenfieldDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9779-2486
Benedict HayhoeImperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2645-6191
Azeem MajeedPrimary Care, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-9858
Ana Luisa NevesImperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7107-7211
Henock B TaddeseDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4048-9085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDiabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that entails significant burdens to patients, caregivers and society at large. While self-management behaviours like healthy eating and monitoring of blood glucose help to reduce the care burden, they are still perceived to be burdensome. Mobile applications have emerged as promising digital tools in helping patients to self-manage their conditions. We conducted systematic review to explore the perceptions and experiences of adults with types 1, 2 and gestational diabetes using mobile applications for self-management in diabetes.

designA systematic review of published primary studies exploring perceptions and experiences of adults living with types 1, 2 and gestational diabetes who used/have used mobile applications for self-management. The study was reported following the best practice guidelines defined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. DATA SOURCES: We searched for articles published from January 2007 to December 2023 via MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (Ovid) and Scopus (Elsevier). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary qualitative studies that describe the perceptions and experiences of adults in using mobile applications in self-management of types 1, 2 and gestational diabetes published between January 2007 and December 2023. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened identified papers for eligibility, extracted data using a pre-defined data extraction form and applied the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool to appraise the quality of the included studies. Data were narratively synthesised, guided by the 'unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT)' framework.

resultsA total of 24 qualitative studies deploying interviews and surveys with open-ended questions were included in the review. We identified four major themes, which were mapped against the constructs of the 'UTAUT' framework: 'performance expectancy', 'effort expectancy', 'social influence' and 'facilitating conditions'.More than 50% of the studies described favourable app features relating to monitoring blood glucose, diet and exercise while also emphasising the importance of customising these to patient needs. About 40% of the studies described unfavourable aspects related to uploading of excessive information, monitoring device incompatibility, episodic app crashes and telephone handling issues.

conclusionThe review supports the favourable view of mobile applications as promising tools in helping patients with diabetes to self-manage. However, the challenges on the ease of use and non-customised features of the apps potentially hinder patients' long-term engagement.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Mobile ApplicationsSelf-ManagementAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyCell PhoneDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYeHealthPatientsReviewSelf-Management

Identifiers

PMID39833008
PMCPMC11751966

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.