ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2025
Proof-of-concept for integrating multimodal digital health assessments into lifestyle interventions for older adults with dementia risk factors.
Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multimodal digital health assessments overcome the limitations of patient-reported outcomes by allowing for continuous and passive monitoring but remain underutilized in older adult lifestyle interventions for brain health. Therefore, we aim to (1) report ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and ActiGraph adherence among older adults during a lifestyle intervention; and (2) use dynamic data collected via EMA and ActiGraph to examine person-specific patterns of mindfulness, steps, and sleep throughout the intervention. We analyzed EMA and ActiGraph data from a pilot study of the 8-week My Healthy Brain program (N = 10) lifestyle group for older adults (60+) with subjective cognitive decline. EMA adherence metrics included proportion of EMA completed and the proportion of days with at least 10 mindfulness minutes. ActiGraph GT9X adherence metrics included the number of valid wear days (≥ 7 h) and the number of days participants achieved their step goal. We used linear mixed-effects models to examine person-specific patterns of step count, sleep efficiency, and mindfulness practice. On average, participants completed 39 of the 49 possible EMAs (80%) during the program. ActiGraph adherence was slightly higher than EMA (M = 61.40 days, 87.71%). Participants achieved the daily mindfulness goal (10 min/day) and step goal on 46.32% and 55.10% of days, respectively. Dynamic data revealed that on average, participant step counts increased by approximately 16.5 steps per day (b = 16.495, p = 0.002). However, some participants exhibited no changes while improvements made by other participants returned to baseline levels of activity. There was substantial heterogeneity in trajectories of mindfulness practice and sleep efficiency. EMA and ActiGraph are feasible for older adults enrolled in dementia risk reduction lifestyle interventions. Future studies are needed to better understand how mechanisms of lifestyle behaviors captured by EMA and ActiGraph are related to cognitive outcomes in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39833389What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.