SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Deep learning algorithms for predicting pathological complete response in MRI of rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Models Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting Pathological Complete Response in Rectal Cancer: External Validation of Clinical Models.Cancers · 2026Article
- Challenges in rectal cancer MRI: from image acquisition to interpretation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Automated deep learning model for predicting pathological complete response in rectal cancer: A tool to organ-preserving strategies.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results Are Concordant with Pathology Staging in Rectal Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- MRI-based radiomics for preoperative T-staging of rectal cancer: a retrospective analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis systematic review examines the utility of deep learning algorithms in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) in rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The primary goal is to evaluate the performance of MRI-based artificial intelligence (AI) models and explore factors affecting their diagnostic accuracy.
methodsThe review followed PRISMA guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024628017). Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library using keywords such as "artificial intelligence," "rectal cancer," "MRI," and "pathological complete response." Articles involving deep learning models applied to MRI for predicting pCR were included, excluding non-MRI data and studies without AI applications. Data on study characteristics, MRI sequences, AI model details, and performance metrics were extracted. Quality assessment was performed using the PROBAST tool.
resultsOut of 512 initial records, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies demonstrated promising diagnostic performance, with AUC values for external validation typically exceeding 0.8. The use of T2W and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI phases enhanced model accuracy compared to T2W alone. Larger datasets generally correlated with improved model performance. However, heterogeneity in model designs, MRI protocols, and the limited integration of clinical data were noted as challenges.
conclusionAI-enhanced MRI demonstrates significant potential in predicting pCR in rectal cancer, particularly with T2W + DWI sequences and larger datasets. While integrating clinical data remains controversial, standardizing methodologies and expanding datasets will further enhance model robustness and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.