Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39833511›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2025

Perceptions of patients and stakeholders on a prenatal sickle cell disease screening and its results among tribal populations of Gujarat: a participatory mixed-method research.

Apurvakumar Pandya, Kapil Dave, Shrey Desai, Gayatri Desai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Apurvakumar PandyaIndian Institute of Public Health, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. apandya@iiphg.org.
Kapil DaveSEWA Rural, Jhagadia, Gujarat, India.
Shrey DesaiSEWA Rural, Jhagadia, Gujarat, India.
Gayatri DesaiSEWA Rural, Jhagadia, Gujarat, India.

Funding

SEWA Rural Agreement-01-20/06/2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal screening (PNS) for Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) offers a potential avenue for informed reproductive choices and the sickle elimination initiative of the Government of India. The objective of the study was to explore perceptions and ethical dilemmas surrounding prenatal screening for sickle cell disease and subsequent termination of pregnancy among pregnant women and key stakeholders from the tribal region of Gujarat. The study employed sequential mixed-methods research, embedding a participatory research approach. Pregnant women and key stakeholders from Jhaghadia, Bharuch District of Gujarat were interviewed. The qualitative data was analyzed using a thematic analytic framework, and the quantitative data was presented with descriptive statistics. Findings revealed key themes such as knowledge about SCD and its management, knowledge about PNS, barriers to PNS, acceptance of PNS and ethical dilemmas related to the termination of pregnancy (TOP). The results show a mixed preference for prenatal screening from both qualitative and quantitative data, primarily due to the complex decision-making process. Couples with SCD reported a high preference for PNS and TOP if the foetus had sickle cell disease whereas couples living with SCD trait were assigned lowest priority and preference to under-go PNS and TOP. Decisions were influenced by limited knowledge, lack of lived experience of SCD, family pressure, cultural and religious beliefs, and social stigma. A comprehensive behaviour change communication strategies that empower couples and key stakeholders through culturally sensitive SCD & PNS literacy, and genetic counselling is essential to promote informed decision-making within the cultural context of tribal communities.

Indexed as

Genetic counsellingPre-natal screeningSickle cell diseaseSickle cell elimination missionTermination of pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39833511
PMCPMC11978601

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.