ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Rehabilitation, reablement, and restorative care approaches in the aged care sector: a scoping review of systematic reviews.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Evaluating the Modified Barthel Index for Policy and Practice in Reablement: Lessons From Australia's Short-Term Restorative Care Program.Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Article
- Mapping of Reablement Research - A Scoping Review of Reviews.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Core principles and structures of geriatric rehabilitation: a narrative review.Ewha medical journal · 2025Article
- International Delphi study on terminology, organisation and outcomes of geriatric rehabilitation for older people living at home.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Models of care across settings supporting ageing in place: a narrative review.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of New Reactivation Approaches in Integrated Long-Term Care-Contribution to the Long-Term Care Act.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAgeing populations are set to drive up demand for aged care services, placing strain on economies funding social care systems. Rehabilitation, reablement, and restorative care approaches are essential to this demographic shift as they aim to support independent function and quality of life of older people. Understanding the impact of these approaches requires nuanced insights into their definitions, funding, and delivery within the aged care context. This scoping review mapped and compared systematic review-level research on rehabilitation, reablement, and restorative care approaches within aged care with the aim of determining definitional clarity, key themes, and the professional groups delivering each approach.
methodsNine databases were searched (2012 to September 2023) to identify English-language systematic reviews on aged care-based rehabilitation, reablement and/or restorative care. Two reviewers independently screened studies following predetermined eligibility criteria. Only reviews reporting quality appraisal findings were eligible. Data charting and synthesis followed the Arksey and O'Malley approach and are reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
resultsForty-one reviews met inclusion criteria. Most (68%) reported on rehabilitation in aged care, and eight (20%) combined the approaches. Only 14 reviews (34%) defined the approach they described. Reviews centred on services for older people in the home or community (n = 15), across a mix of settings including community, hospital, and residential care (n = 10). Ten distinct themes highlight the importance of multidisciplinary teams, allied health, risk of falls, hip fracture, reduced functional independence, and specific types of interventions including physical activity, technology, cognitive rehabilitation, goal setting, and transition care. Most reviews described the role of occupational therapists (n = 22), physiotherapists (n = 20) and nurses (n = 14) with wider support from the multidisciplinary team. The quality of primary studies within the reviews varied widely.
conclusionsThis scoping review summarises the evidence landscape for rehabilitation, reablement, and restorative care approaches in the context of aged care. Despite their role in enhancing independence and quality of life for older people, policy, funding, and terminology variation means the evidence lacks clarity. This fragmented evidence makes it challenging to argue the effectiveness of one approach over another for older people in receipt of aged care services. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.