ArticleBMC public health2025
Constructing a fall risk prediction model for hospitalized patients using machine learning.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Machine learning-based prediction model for fall risk among individuals with arthritis in China: an analysis using the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) database.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- A policy instrument-based textual analysis of elderly care policies in the context of low fertility in China.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Falls Among Hospitalized Older Adults: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Medication Adherence Among Home-Dwelling Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Admission clinical and functional assessments for predicting inpatient fall risk using machine learning models.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesThis study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with falls in hospitalized patients, develop a predictive risk model using machine learning algorithms, and evaluate the validity of the model's predictions. STUDY
designA cross-sectional design was employed using data from the DRYAD public database. RESEARCH
methodsThe study utilized data from the Fukushima Medical University Hospital Cohort Study, obtained from the DRYAD public database. 20% of the dataset was allocated as an independent test set, while the remaining 80% was utilized for training and validation. To address data imbalance in binary variables, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique combined with Edited Nearest Neighbors (SMOTE-ENN) was applied. Univariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were used to analyze and screen variables. Predictive models were constructed by integrating key clinical features, and eight machine learning algorithms were evaluated to identify the most effective model. Additionally, SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) was used to interpret the predictive models and rank the importance of risk factors.
resultsThe final model included the following variables: Adl_standing, Adl_evacuation, Age_group, Planned_surgery, Wheelchair, History_of_falls, Hypnotic_drugs, Psychotropic_drugs, and Remote_caring_system. Among the evaluated models, the Random Forest algorithm demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.814 (95% CI: 0.802-0.827) in the training set, 0.781 (95% CI: 0.740-0.821) in the validation set, and 0.795 (95% CI: 0.770-0.820) in the test set.
conclusionMachine learning algorithms, particularly Random Forest, are effective in predicting fall risk among hospitalized patients. These findings can significantly enhance fall prevention strategies within healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.