ArticleBMC nursing2025
Caregiving experiences of family caregivers of disabled middle-aged and older adults enrolled in long-term care insurance: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The future of long-term care financing in Ghana: preferences among dual-role unorganised caregivers of older adults.npj health systems · 2026Article
- The validation of the CarerQol instrument and factors associated with quality of life among informal caregivers of disabled older adults in China.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Burnout and Its Associated Factors Among Long-Term Care Workers: A Mixed-Methods Study Based on the Social-Ecological Framework.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mediating effect of family functioning on depressive symptoms and family resilience in dementia caregivers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLong-term care insurance (LTCI) projects were an essential components of health systems designed to support disabled people and their families. Despite LTCI has been getting more and more attention and promotion, there was a lack of qualitative study to explore the experiences of family caregivers who were directly involved in the care of disabled people enrolled in these projects. This study aimed to explore the experiences of family caregivers in the caregiving process within the context of LTCI.
methodsThis qualitative study used inductive content analysis to explore the experiences of family caregivers of disabled people. Fifteen family caregivers from long-term care service companies and communities in Nantong city were purposively selected to participate in the study between December 2023 to February 2024. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted to collect data. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim.
resultsThe results revealed a total of five major themes with thirteen sub-themes including: (1) caregiver fatigue (i.e. heavy daily care tasks, and lack of rest); (2) emotional stress (helplessness and depression, and isolated and alone); (3) perceived benefits of caregiving (emotional connection, and a new outlook on life); (4) more expectations for LTCI (expect respite care, expect medical care facilities, expect longer service duration and frequency, and expect more economic subsidies); and (5) positive evaluations of LTCI (provide psychological support, reduce the burden of care, and professional care services).
conclusionsThis study's findings improved our understanding of caregiving experiences among family caregivers of disabled people enrolled in LTCI. Identifying caregivers' experiences enabled the authorities to develop support strategies and interventions focused on helping them reduce the caregiver burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.