ArticleBMC oral health2025
Characteristics of tongue coating microbiota in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney patients receiving hemodialysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Objective tongue phenotyping identifies phenotypic heterogeneity in diabetic kidney disease: a dual-center clustering analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Oral Findings Linked to Chronic Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTongue-coating microbiota, especially known as the tongue microbiome, holds significant value as both a prospective clinical diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target, which plays a crucial role in the oral microecological health. However, there is limited understanding of the composition and function of tongue coating microbiota in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis.
methodsThirty-one non-diabetic hemodialysis patients (nonDM_HD), 29 diabetic hemodialysis patients (DM_HD) and 33 healthy controls (HC) were enrolled. Swabs from tongue coating were collected. The 16S rDNA (V3-V4 region) was sequenced to scrutinize the tongue-coating bacterial microbiome difference.
resultsBoth nonDM_HD and DM_HD showed distinct bacterial communities of oral microbiota compared to HC. The abundance of Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Ruminococcaceae G1, Ligilactobacillus and Abiotrophia showed a significant increase (p < 0.05) in DM_HD and nonDM_HD compared to HC, while Haemophilus, Lachnoanaerobaculum, Peptostreptococcaceae G1, Peptostreptococcus showed a significant decrease (p < 0.05) respectively. Veillonella, Lactobacillus, Limosilactobacillus etc. may serve as potential biomarkers for DM_HD. While Streptococcus, Ruminococcaceae G1, Actinobacillus, Abiotrophia can be considered alternative biomarkers for nonDM_HD. Moreover, the enriched Haemophilus, Actinomyces, Lachnoanaerobaculum were prominent features of the tongue coating microbiota in HC, which could be used as the potential therapeutic targets of chronic kidney disease. Network analysis revealed a less complex interaction relationship among the tongue coating bacterial microbiota of nonDM_HD and DM_HD. Furthermore, correlations were identified between the microbiome composition and clinical parameters of the individuals.
conclusionIn conclusion, deciphering the tongue coating microbiota of kidney patients undergoing hemodialysis will helpful in assessing the role of oral microbiota in pathobiology and development of kidney disease, which is expected to become a potential biomarkers and adjuvant therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.