Trial reportKorean journal of anesthesiology2025
Analgesic efficacy of the external oblique intercostal fascial plane block on postoperative acute pain in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative Effectiveness of Fascial Plane Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Analgesic Efficacy of External Oblique Intercostal Block in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of external oblique intercostal block on early postoperative pain and recovery in patients undergoing J-shaped incisions for upper abdominal surgery: a single-center prospective randomized controlled study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Effect of External Oblique Intercostal Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Early Recovery in Patients Undergoing Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Local and regional anesthesia · 2025Trial
- External oblique intercostal plane block for postoperative analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- External oblique intercostal plane block: A scoping review of anatomy, techniques, and clinical applications.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Review
- Impact of external oblique intercostal plane block on postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Analgesia for Upper Abdominal Surgery, a Scoping Review of the Current Fascial Plane Block Techniques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Evidence-Based Perioperative Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Safety and efficacy of the external oblique intercostal plane block for postoperative analgesia in upper abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) causes significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective multimodal analgesia strategies. This study evaluated the efficacy of the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) in this context.
methodsThis prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study conducted between April and December 2023 included 60 patients who underwent LSG. Patients were divided into the EOIB (30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine/side) and control (no block) groups. The primary outcome was the cumulative intravenous morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included 12-h MME consumption, pain scores, intraoperative remifentanil use, rescue analgesia requirements, time to first analgesic request, nausea/vomiting scores, antiemetic use, and American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised Turkish Version (APS-POQ-R-TR) scores.
resultsThe control group had significantly higher median opioid consumption than the EOIB group at 12 (14.4 vs. 5.8 mg; P < 0.001) and 24 h (25.9 vs. 10.6 mg; P < 0.001) postoperatively. The need for rescue analgesics did not differ significantly (43.3 vs. 23.3%; P = 0.1). The EOIB group exhibited significantly higher patient satisfaction (APS-POQ-R-TR score 2.91 vs. 4.42; P < 0.001) and consistently lower pain scores across all time points (P < 0.001). The EOIB group had lower nausea/vomiting scores (P < 0.001), fewer patients requiring antiemetics (16.7% vs. 40%; P = 0.045), longer time to first morphine request (57.5 vs. 25 min; P < 0.001), and lower remifentanil use (850 vs. 1050 μg; P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe preoperative EOIB, as a part of multimodal analgesia, provides effective analgesia for acute pain in patients undergoing LSG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.