Evidence mapPaperPMID 39834528Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025

Time trends of catheter-directed treatment in acute pulmonary embolism in Germany.

Karsten Keller, Frank P Schmidt, Ioannis T Farmakis, Stefano Barco, Karl Fengler, Maike Knorr, Tommaso Gori, Thomas Münzel, Philipp Lurz, Lukas Hobohm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Catheter-directed thrombectomy in acute pulmonary embolism and angiographic signs of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Karsten KellerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Frank P SchmidtDepartment of Cardiology, Mutterhaus Trier, Germany.
Ioannis T FarmakisDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Stefano BarcoCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Karl FenglerDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Maike KnorrDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Tommaso GoriDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas MünzelDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Philipp LurzDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Lukas HobohmDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Catheter-directed treatment (CDT) is an innovative treatment for patients with elevated risk pulmonary embolism (PE) to resolve embolus and restore pulmonary perfusion. Objectives: We aimed to analyse the use and the benefit of CDT in PE patients in Germany. Methods: The German nationwide inpatient sample was used to include all hospitalizations of patients with PE from 2005 to 2020 in Germany. PE patients were stratified for CDT usage. Temporal trends and the impact of CDT on case fatality and other outcomes were investigated. Results: Overall, 1,373,084 hospitalizations of patients with PE (55.9% aged ≥70 years; 53.0% females) were included in this study from 2005 to 2020, and among these, 427,238 (31.1%) patients were categorized as having elevated-risk PE and 3330 (0.2%) were treated with CDT with annual increase from 0.17% (2005) to 0.51% (2020). PE patients of younger age, male sex, with previous surgery, and elevated-risk PE were more often treated with CDT. In patients with elevated risk-PE, CDT attributed to a lower observed rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]; 28.2% vs 34.2%; Conclusion: Although the annual rate of CDT increased in Germany between 2005 and 2020, only 0.2% of the PE patients were treated with CDT. Selection criteria for CDT treatment were younger age, male sex, previous surgery, and elevated risk-PE. CDT treatment was associated with reduced MACCE and case-fatality rate in PE patients with elevated-risk PE.

Indexed as

catheter-directed treatmentlocal lysislocal therapypulmonary embolismthrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID39834528
PMCPMC11743116

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.