ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Time trends of catheter-directed treatment in acute pulmonary embolism in Germany.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Modern therapy of pulmonary embolism with PERT and EKOS: an advantage also for in-hospital time?]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Article
- Association of left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral with severity of pulmonary embolism in patients treated with catheter-directed therapies.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Catheter-directed thrombectomy in acute pulmonary embolism and angiographic signs of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Physician Survey on the Management of Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Need for Guidance and Training.EJHaem · 2025Article
- Low-Dose Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Massive Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Report Highlighting Dosing Considerations in Asian Patients.Case reports in cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Catheter-directed treatment (CDT) is an innovative treatment for patients with elevated risk pulmonary embolism (PE) to resolve embolus and restore pulmonary perfusion. Objectives: We aimed to analyse the use and the benefit of CDT in PE patients in Germany. Methods: The German nationwide inpatient sample was used to include all hospitalizations of patients with PE from 2005 to 2020 in Germany. PE patients were stratified for CDT usage. Temporal trends and the impact of CDT on case fatality and other outcomes were investigated. Results: Overall, 1,373,084 hospitalizations of patients with PE (55.9% aged ≥70 years; 53.0% females) were included in this study from 2005 to 2020, and among these, 427,238 (31.1%) patients were categorized as having elevated-risk PE and 3330 (0.2%) were treated with CDT with annual increase from 0.17% (2005) to 0.51% (2020). PE patients of younger age, male sex, with previous surgery, and elevated-risk PE were more often treated with CDT. In patients with elevated risk-PE, CDT attributed to a lower observed rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]; 28.2% vs 34.2%; Conclusion: Although the annual rate of CDT increased in Germany between 2005 and 2020, only 0.2% of the PE patients were treated with CDT. Selection criteria for CDT treatment were younger age, male sex, previous surgery, and elevated risk-PE. CDT treatment was associated with reduced MACCE and case-fatality rate in PE patients with elevated-risk PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.