ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Recent advances in innovative biomaterials for promoting bladder regeneration: processing and functionalization.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The engineered bladder patch with a three-layer structure promotes the regeneration and functional recovery of the bladder in a rabbit model.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- The Future of Bladder Cancer Therapies: Integrating Hydrogel Scaffolds for Epigenetic Regulator Delivery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Kidney and Bladder Transplantation: Advances, Barriers, and Emerging Solutions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Seven cases of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with Bordeaux neobladder: A clinical observation.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bladder is a dynamic organ located in the lower urinary tract, responsible for complex and important physiological activities in the human body, including collecting and storing urine. Severe diseases or bladder injuries often lead to tissue destruction and loss of normal function, requiring surgical intervention and reconstruction. The rapid development of innovative biomaterials has brought revolutionary opportunities for modern urology to overcome the limitations of tissue transplantation. This article first summarized the latest research progress in the processing approaches and functionalization of acellular matrix, hydrogels, nanomaterials, and porous scaffolds in repairing and reconstructing the physiological structure and dynamic function of damaged bladder. Then, we discussed emerging strategies for bladder regeneration and functional recovery, such as cell therapy, organoids, etc. Finally, we outlined the important issues and future development prospects of biomaterials in bladder regeneration to inspire future research directions. By reviewing these innovative biomaterials and technologies, we hope to provide appropriate insights to achieve the ultimate goal of designing and manufacturing artificial bladder substitutes with ideal performance in all aspects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.