Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39834693›Full record

Trial reportTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2024

Nurse-Led Self-Management Support After Organ Transplantation - A Multicenter, Stepped-Wedge Randomized Controlled Trial.

Regina van Zanten, Monique van Dijk, Joost van Rosmalen, Denise K Beck, AnneLoes van Staa, Ann Van Hecke, Emma K Massey

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transplant International: Looking Back at 2025, Looking Forward to 2026.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Regina van ZantenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Monique van DijkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Nursing Science, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Joost van RosmalenDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Denise K BeckDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
AnneLoes van StaaResearch Centre Innovations in Care, University of Applied Sciences Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ann Van HeckeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University Centre of Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Emma K MasseyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this unblinded multi-center stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial the effectiveness of the nurse-led ZENN-intervention was tested in promoting self-management skills in comparison to standard care among heart, lung and kidney transplant recipients. This intervention is based on behaviour change theories and was conducted in four sessions over 6 months at the outpatient clinic. The experimental group received standard care, plus the ZENN-intervention, while the control group received only standard care. Both groups completed questionnaires at baseline, at 6 months and 1 year follow-up. At baseline, the experimental group (n = 69) scored significantly lower than the control group (n = 106) on the primary outcome Skills and Technique Acquisition (STA). No significant between-group differences were found on the secondary outcomes self-management, self-regulation, quality of life and medication adherence at T1 and T2. There was a significant increase on the self-management scale STA between T0 and T1 in the experimental group. Therefore, participants included in the experimental group had lower self-management skills at baseline and reported significant improvement after completing the intervention. No significant intervention effect was found in the primary analysis, however, for recipients with reduced self-management skills the intervention may be beneficial. Clinical Trial Registration: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/24150, Netherlands Trial Register NL8469.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationSelf-ManagementAdultAgedFemaleHeart TransplantationHumansKidney TransplantationLung TransplantationMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTransplant Recipientsgoalmotivationnurse practitionerspatient participationself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID39834693
PMCPMC11745145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.