ArticlePeerJ2025
The relationship between steroid treatment and mortality in patients with COVID-19 followed up in an intensive care unit.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medication, Nutrition, and Hygiene in COVID-19 Prevention and Treatment: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Optimal treatment of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is still unclear. It has been reported that the use of different doses of corticosteroid treatments may reduce mortality. In our study, we aimed to find the effect of corticosteroid treatment dose on mortality of patients followed up in intensive care due to COVID-19. Methods: Our retrospective, descriptive and single-centre study included 102 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who were followed up in intensive care unit, 28 of whom received pulse steroids and 74 of whom received high dose steroids. Laboratory values, duration of intensive care unit and mortality rates of the patients were evaluated. Results: Mortality was found to be statistically significantly lower in the group receiving pulse steroid compared to the group receiving high dose steroid. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age and pulse steroid were found to be independent predictors of mortality. According to this analysis, each 10-year increase in age increased mortality by 4.8%, whereas pulse steroid decreased mortality by 79.4%. Conclusion: In our study, we found that mortality was statistically significantly lower in the group of patients receiving pulse steroids than in the group receiving high dose steroids. We found that the number of patients using pulse steroids was statistically significantly lower in the group with mortality. We found that age and pulse steroid independently determined the patients with mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.